Peer reviewed publications

(Click ADS or arXiv in each section to see full article and detail.)



All-sky map of the Swift-BAT 105 month sources. Click to see the whole features.

The Swift-BAT 105 month all-sky hard X-ray survey

Oh et al. (2018)

ADS . arXiv

The 105 month Swift-BAT survey is a uniform hard X-ray all-sky survey with a sensitivity of 8.40×10 −12 ergs −1 cm −2 over 90% of the sky and 7.24 × 10 −12 erg s −1 cm −2 over 50% of the sky in the 14 − 195 keV band. The Swift -BAT 105 month catalog provides 1633 (423 new detections) hard X-ray sources in the 14 − 195 keV band above the 4.8σ significance level. Adding to the previously known hard X-ray sources, 32% (137/423) of the new detections are identified as Seyfert AGN in nearby galaxies (z < 0.2). The majority of the remaining identified sources are X-ray binaries (7%, 29) and blazars/BL Lac objects (9%, 36). As part of this new edition of the Swift-BAT catalog, we release eight-channel spectra and monthly sampled light curves for each object in the online journal and at the Swift -BAT 105 month Web site.


The observed relationship between MBH, Lbol, and λEdd with optical emission line ratios

Oh et al. (2017)

ADS . arXiv

Using nearby and bright hard X-ray selected AGN, I showed that [NII]λ6583/Hα ratio exhibits a significant correlation with λ Edd(RPear=-0.44, p-value=3x10-13, σ=0.28 dex), and correlation is not solely driven by MBH or Lbol.

The observed correlation between [NII]λ6583/Hα ratio and MBH is stronger than the correlation with L bol, but both are weaker than the λEdd correlation. This implies that the larg-scale narrow lines of AGN host galaxies carry information about the accretion state of the AGN central engine. We propose that the [NII]λ6583/Hα is a useful indicator of Eddington ratio with 0.6 dex of rms scatter, and that it can be used to measure λEdd and thus MBH from the measured Lbol, even for high redshift obscured AGN. Possible physical mechanisms behind this correlation are 1) mass-metallicity relation, 2) X-ray heating, and 3) radiatively driven outflows. 

BPT diagnostic diagram as a function of Eddington ratio for hard X-ray selected AGN (BASS). Click to see the whole features.


Black hole mass and bolometric luminosity distribution for type 1 AGN as a function of type 1 AGN fraction (color), Click to see the whole features.

A New Catalog of Type 1 AGNs and its Implications on the AGN Unified Model

Oh et al. (2015)

ADS . arXiV

I discovered a substantial number of unidentified and unexplored population of galaxies featuring weak broad-line region in the nearby Universe (z < 0.2) and investigated their implications on the AGN unified model. Through this research, I proved that the receding torus model is only partially valid and it requires more valid formulation to explain the current observational results. Furthermore, I showed that neither black hole mass nor bolometric luminosity solely determines the type 1 AGN fraction which is a measure of an average torus opening angle.


Demographics of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies along the Hubble Sequence

Oh et al. (2013)

ADS . arXiV

I presented the statistical properties of a volume-limited sample of 7429 nearby (z = 0.033–0.044) galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7. Our database includes morphology distribution as well as the structural and spectroscopic properties of each morphology type based on the spectral line strengths (the OSSY catalog, Oh et al. 2011). Our database does not include galaxies that are apparently smaller and flatter because morphology classification of them turned out to be difficult. Our statistics confirmed the up-to-date knowledge of galaxy populations, e.g., correlations between morphology and line strengths as well as the derived ages. 

 

Samples of the SDSS DR7 composite images of morphologically classified galaxies in the Hubble Sequence. Click to see the whole features.


Improved and Quality-assessed Emission and Absorption Line Measurements in SDSS Galaxies

Oh et al. (2011)

ADS . arXiv

Example of spectral line decomposition. Click to see the whole features.

Spectroscopic data provides a fossil record of galaxies featuring stellar absorption and nebular emission lines. The prominent stellar absorption features give us the average surface gravities, effective temperatures, metal abundances, and kinematics of stellar components. Nebular emission lines, on the other hand, probe the physical state of the ionized gas in galaxies and thus can be used to trace the nuclear activity of central supermassive black holes, or their instantaneous star formation rate. From the detailed and improved analysis of more than half million SDSS galaxy spectra (z < 0.2, N=664,187), I released a publicly available galaxy line strength database (the OSSY database) to the community which provides the strength of nebular emission lines, stellar absorption lines, and stellar velocity dispersion. The OSSY database provides more accurate line strengths by decomposing nebular emission lines from stellar absorption features. The OSSY database also achieved better spectral line fitting by adopting empirical stellar templates compared to the SDSS pipeline. Moreover, the database provides a quality parameter assessing the goodness of spectral line fitting so that users can chose proper datasets based on their purposes. 

 


Talks

Conference presentations

  1. East Asia AGN Workshop 2019, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, (Jan 2019)

  2. Formation and evolution of SMBHs revealed by 'Wide field', 'Multi-wavelength', and 'Transient' surveys with HSC, Tohoku University, Japan (Nov 2018)

  3. Korea Astronomical Society Meeting, Cheongsong, Korea (Oct 2018)

  4. Korea Astronomical Society Meeting, Hongcheon, Korea (May 2018)

  5. KOOLS-IFU workshop, Kyoto University, Japan (Feb 2018)

  6. American Astronomical Society 231st Meeting, Washington DC, USA (Jan 2018): Special Session

  7. Korea Astronomical Society Meeting, Daejeon, Korea (Oct 2016)

  8. East Asia AGN Workshop 2016, Seoul National University, South Korea (Sep 2016)

  9. The X-ray View of Black Hole Activity in the local Universe, ETH Zurich, Switzerland (Feb 2016)

  10. Demographics and environments of AGN from multi-wavelength surveys, Crete, Greece (Sep 2015)

  11. International Astronomical Union 284 Symposium, Preston, UK (Sep 2011)

  12. American Astronomical Society 215th Meeting, Washington DC, USA (Jan 2010)

  13. The 2nd Korea-Japan Science Seminar, Hiraizumi, Japan (Nov 200)

  14. Korean Astronomical Society Meeting, Gwacheon, Korea (April 2009)

Departmental seminars

  1. Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungnam National University, South Korea (Jan 2017)

  2. Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Japan (Oct 2016)

  3. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (Mitaka) (Oct 2016)

  4. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, Japan (Oct 2016)

  5. Instituto de Astrofisica, Pontificia Universidad Cato ́lica de Chile, Chile(Mar 2016)

  6. Physics and Astronomy department, Seoul National University, Korea (Aug 2015)

  7. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, South Korea (July 2015)

  8. Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, USA (May 2015)

  9. Astrophysics division (code 600), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA (May 2015)

  10. Institute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland (Apr 2014)

  11. Institute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland (Oct 2013)

  12. School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Nottingham, UK (Jan 2012)


Awards

  1. The CSR travel grant, Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy (July, 2017)

  2. MERAC funding and travel grant, Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy (Feb, 2016)

  3. Outstanding paper award (the best thesis), Graduate School of Yonsei University (Oct, 2015)

  4. Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship (2013 - 2014)

  5. Outstanding paper award (journal), Graduate School of Yonsei University (Oct, 2011)

  6. Lotte Scholarship, The Lotte Scholarship Foundation (2006 - 2007, 2010)

  7. The Highest Honors, Yonsei University (May, 2007)

  8. High Honors, Yonsei University (Oct, 2006)

  9. Honors, Yonsei University (May, 2006)

  10. Yonsei designated scholarship (Mar, 2003)


Accepted Telescope Time Proposals

  1. (coI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 103, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 63 hours (2019)

  2. (coI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 102, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 61 hours (2018)

  3. (coI) SOAR 4.1m, GOODMAN at CTIO, Chile: 8 nights (2018)

  4. (coI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 101, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 29 hours (2018)

  5. (coI) Magellan Clay 6.5m, LDSS3 at Las Campanas, Chile: 2 night (2018)

  6. (PI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 100, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 1 hour (2017)

  7. (PI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 99, FORS2 at Paranal, Chile: 31 hours (2017)

  8. (PI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 99, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 37 hours (2017)

  9. (PI) ESO VLT 8.2m, period 98, XSHOOTER at Paranal, Chile: 13 hours (2016)

  10. (coI) Magellan Clay 6.5m, LDSS3 at Las Campanas, Chile: 1 night (2016)

  11. (coI) Ir ́en ́ee du Pont 2.5m, B&C at Las Campanas, Chile: 10 nights (2016)

  12. (coI) Wisconsin-Indiana-Yale-NOAO (WIYN) 3.5m, MiniMo at Kitt-Peak, USA: 5 nights (2011 - 2012)